{"id":"W2112664766","doi":"10.1002/app.42981","title":"Impact toughness, viscoelastic behavior, and morphology of polypropylene–jute–viscose hybrid composites","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Polymer Science","topic":"Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Association for Progressive Communications; Department of Chemicals and Petrochemicals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, India","keywords":"Composite material; Materials science; Charpy impact test; Izod impact strength test; Toughness; Polypropylene; Viscoelasticity; Thermogravimetric analysis; Viscose; Thermal stability; Composite number; Fiber; Ultimate tensile strength; Chemical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008328375,0.0002395506,0.0005104022,0.000423699,0.0001420746,0.000161415,0.0009986975,0.00005579353,0.00005657661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003545733,0.0001709316,0.00009172066,0.000556074,0.001278552,0.0007821959,0.0003418891,0.0002434701,0.00002192213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001090331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005721042,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006004602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.852613e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975292,0.00003380078,0.0006928187,0.0003049013,0.0009520057,0.0004872844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979361,0.0001201331,0.0007606479,0.0003293416,0.0003580285,0.000495804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002624579,0.00006843884,0.0009896796,0.000008384833,0.000009008865,0.00004054876,0.0002281625,0.0000982884,0.9960712,0.0008448244,0.0001119461,0.001267117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007422548,0.0006189667,0.002585544,0.00002844592,0.00006534184,0.001158407,0.00005814688,0.0001532407,0.9940503,0.0003286253,0.00001615945,0.0001945941],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963984,0.001993966,0.000293724,0.0000902476,0.0005500451,0.0001443436,0.00001359406,0.00001851391,0.0004971121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964351,0.00001394638,0.003319761,0.0000859695,0.0001004697,0.0000032391,8.919438e-7,0.00001453348,0.00002608942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003026037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6970388,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01347157810515291,"score_gpt":0.2754073245194632,"score_spread":0.2619357464143103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}