{"id":"W2112705205","doi":"10.1139/x02-125","title":"Predicting survival and growth rates for individual loblolly pine trees from light capture estimates","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Basal area; Loblolly pine; Site index; Range (aeronautics); Pinus <genus>; Sowing; Growth model; Statistics; Growth rate; Ecology; Tree (set theory); Biology; Forestry; Mathematics; Geography; Agronomy; Botany","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001075443,0.0004358237,0.0002716266,0.0006025304,0.0001886702,0.0003259323,0.0003088114,0.0002588404,0.0005083804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002591474,0.0002309185,0.000424496,0.0004346477,0.0001312191,0.0004496048,0.0002539016,0.0003294582,0.0002977066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005346975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003514828,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04707988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.127639,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998413,0.00004252479,0.000008933534,0.00004764353,0.00003069176,0.00002873326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988342,0.0007179691,0.0001852143,0.00008122058,0.0001209179,0.00006041854],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002066367,0.00009982479,0.8479313,0.00005528032,0.0001183663,0.00004114421,0.0001702689,0.1047403,0.004682741,0.0002383924,0.0004183905,0.04129735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001513765,0.0001768761,0.6276573,0.00001166785,0.00008260058,0.00007865478,0.0001003643,0.3684634,0.002347528,0.0006045767,0.0004234941,0.00003849263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841502,0.0001506326,0.01446917,0.00002011812,0.000003809935,0.00001376202,0.0006456329,0.00008947271,0.0004573331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914554,0.0001574277,0.006578974,0.000008159654,0.000004303544,0.00002021405,0.001264155,0.00001609446,0.0004953637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04707988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09361166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03317819941647817,"score_gpt":0.2769735545848511,"score_spread":0.2437953551683729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}