{"id":"W2113137767","doi":"10.1109/tpami.2004.60","title":"An experimental comparison of min-cut/max- flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence","topic":"Advanced Neural Network Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4600,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"University of Tsukuba","keywords":"Algorithm; Computer science; Maximum flow problem; Minimum cut; Benchmark (surveying); Maximum cut; Minification; Time complexity; Image segmentation; Segmentation; Running time; Cut; Energy minimization; Artificial intelligence; Graph; Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Mathematical optimization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005013449,0.001557334,0.001155712,0.002968841,0.0009585991,0.001292781,0.002321465,0.001932131,0.006197018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01629268,0.0004500189,0.000809575,0.002927233,0.0009229313,0.002789922,0.001122103,0.001299721,0.001114461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001758149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001184198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003793901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005303922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967982,0.0009868479,0.0003367943,0.0005772703,0.001000068,0.0003008442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861584,0.009247513,0.0003796449,0.00179915,0.002105523,0.0003097714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005115846,0.001792146,0.002672757,0.00173471,0.00037823,0.000138019,0.0001705026,0.3601791,0.01843242,0.01101096,0.01823635,0.5801391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003724523,0.001127107,0.00311863,0.00007147415,0.00008906324,0.0002211204,0.0001718206,0.9445285,0.0367625,0.008579639,0.004903288,0.00005440755],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4158967,0.006478608,0.5283273,0.001506391,0.001007199,0.001017494,0.002699827,0.01392605,0.02914035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.516904,0.001278093,0.4716573,0.0002481318,0.00009848143,0.0004917685,0.003844542,0.001519328,0.003958256],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006197018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02651399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02598367102043963,"score_gpt":0.331384632381408,"score_spread":0.3054009613609683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}