{"id":"W2113350871","doi":"10.1016/j.cag.2005.05.002","title":"A study of diagrammatic ink in lecture","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Graphics","topic":"Multimedia Communication and Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Microsoft Research","keywords":"Diagrammatic reasoning; Diagram; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Identification (biology); Activity diagram; Influence diagram; Human–computer interaction; Information retrieval; Multimedia; Engineering drawing; Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Unified Modeling Language; Engineering; Database","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003398702,0.00005503647,0.0001312306,0.0002411147,0.0000903395,0.00001146723,0.0004776519,0.00008775637,0.00001232073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009144637,0.00005493238,0.00002881148,0.0006983245,0.0001898367,0.00004744265,0.00007804474,0.000190499,0.000004541228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002390339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003741552,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000752964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02660683,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992228,0.0002013224,0.0001878048,0.00009852754,0.0001532675,0.0001362601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993485,0.0002103143,0.00007140807,0.0002940393,0.00004008745,0.00003567412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001113422,0.002139107,0.1758815,0.00001679658,0.0000537571,0.00000756835,0.2278143,0.0002890581,0.00002612949,0.2217117,0.0008315151,0.3712175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01160345,0.001380786,0.4453177,0.0002403653,0.0001154826,0.000007467459,0.06617359,0.05318119,0.0002310853,0.09387357,0.326167,0.001708392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928076,0.0001909346,0.001608997,0.003653305,0.0001164133,0.0003440115,2.324669e-7,0.00009210774,0.001186453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977663,0.000127771,0.001873611,0.0001804969,0.00002820113,0.00001166464,9.09502e-7,0.000003690075,0.000007370129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3695091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03423872765960313,"score_gpt":0.3316565737824468,"score_spread":0.2974178461228437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}