{"id":"W2113350871","doi":"10.1016/j.cag.2005.05.002","title":"A study of diagrammatic ink in lecture","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Graphics","topic":"Multimedia Communication and Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Microsoft Research","keywords":"Diagrammatic reasoning; Diagram; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Identification (biology); Activity diagram; Influence diagram; Human–computer interaction; Information retrieval; Multimedia; Engineering drawing; Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Unified Modeling Language; Engineering; Database","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005216579,0.0001817374,0.0002007588,0.001230956,0.0008462229,0.002395223,0.0005043254,0.0005403488,0.01086998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01184814,0.0001197521,0.0001825735,0.001789598,0.001068115,0.002271722,0.0005901589,0.0005831654,0.0007484155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009217063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006273166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002118962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001496358,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993273,0.0002603113,0.00003076297,0.00008159335,0.000221912,0.00007819378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903247,0.007683979,0.0004577075,0.0005404326,0.0008070212,0.0001860936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023169,0.001018264,0.04866425,0.001468998,0.00005011508,0.004275716,0.0642897,0.01901183,0.08250368,0.3909177,0.004148099,0.3813348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001889393,0.002147422,0.1101337,0.000711041,0.0002777594,0.00710624,0.1047371,0.1214085,0.3132958,0.1208155,0.2189054,0.0002726303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8934487,0.0009810914,0.02522959,0.0002220886,0.00007487815,0.00006128442,0.00008995203,0.0002188568,0.0796736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883955,0.0003278278,0.002789485,0.00001513182,0.000007721889,0.000007747012,0.00004035611,0.00004505227,0.008371144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01086998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03636372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03423872765960313,"score_gpt":0.3316565737824468,"score_spread":0.2974178461228437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}