{"id":"W2113368053","doi":"10.1128/aem.02879-07","title":"Community-Level Assessment of the Effects of the Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial Chlorhexidine on the Outcome of River Microbial Biofilm Development","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied and Environmental Microbiology","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Chlorhexidine; Biology; Microbial population biology; Biomass (ecology); Biofilm; Cyanobacteria; Microbiology; Liter; Food science; Bacteria; Ecology; Medicine; Dentistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000298788,0.0003589193,0.000437837,0.0001828853,0.0001903407,0.0003751472,0.000235701,0.0004069409,0.0007414151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005508497,0.0001302302,0.0002169384,0.0002144319,0.0002100849,0.0002993505,0.0003984327,0.0003567818,0.0001819123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002762954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003792068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001709353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003204493,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996064,0.00008434387,0.00002931631,0.00009698666,0.000110014,0.00007293181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994467,0.00009356716,0.00008142174,0.00002212809,0.0002688359,0.00008745939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000187405,0.00004412943,0.002608078,0.0001339208,0.00001215536,0.00001972892,0.0000487273,0.0000372563,0.994903,0.00001100721,0.00001673607,0.001977991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002477006,0.004793648,0.1927607,0.00004642482,0.0001033385,0.0002244387,0.0006523661,0.001301447,0.798695,0.0000751959,0.001296687,0.00002603856],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967498,0.001197508,0.0007476877,0.00002966741,0.00001079721,0.0000599245,0.0004389439,0.00001340971,0.0007522942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931992,0.001167874,0.003786745,0.00004647299,0.0000091548,0.0000812252,0.0006787697,0.00000880689,0.001021832],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001709353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003398776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02390360218478618,"score_gpt":0.2350077833308973,"score_spread":0.2111041811461112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}