{"id":"W2113421427","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1090.0453","title":"The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1093,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nonmarket forces; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Champion; Business; Context (archaeology); Institutional theory; Affect (linguistics); Embeddedness; Industrial organization; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Market economy; Management; Social psychology; Factor market; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006148033,0.00004883914,0.00006864387,0.0000408696,0.0005275645,0.00007359879,0.0002795415,0.00001504986,0.000009857338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001813383,0.00002783942,0.000009449934,0.001834528,0.00092812,0.0005150508,0.00007878146,0.00002904211,0.000004743766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001066074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001054451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002733477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001444808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993318,0.000007593884,0.0001644062,0.0001150683,0.0003055182,0.00007563634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998729,0.00006680137,0.0002702348,0.00013636,0.0007934639,0.000004167091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000597843,0.00003473986,0.4086442,0.000008388312,0.000002199122,3.618842e-7,0.00006062919,0.0003754021,0.01376723,0.5754194,0.000107689,0.001519952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003325349,0.000004358079,0.9875122,0.000007469273,0.000005221033,0.000002121677,0.00001676438,0.001385696,0.006773114,0.003118824,0.0007986162,0.00004309516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925835,0.00004226194,0.004916702,0.001962154,0.00007001912,0.00009101111,0.000003243005,0.00001090472,0.0003202696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992116,0.00003856212,0.00009598459,0.0005697882,0.00005323234,3.920569e-7,0.000001911707,0.000002127613,0.00002641008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.578868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4057653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0148857906350548,"score_gpt":0.2227869180793035,"score_spread":0.2079011274442487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}