{"id":"W2113421809","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00392.x","title":"Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":294,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Qualitative research; Engineering ethics; Quality (philosophy); Management science; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Field (mathematics); Process (computing); Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology; Social psychology; Social science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7079594,0.002400979,0.006406134,0.0128389,0.01037261,0.03893368,0.01117753,0.03321332,0.001345718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7140904,0.003627987,0.004430205,0.01583649,0.07096256,0.04494613,0.01953206,0.04645616,0.000770859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03913669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0738669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0262229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03652607,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2038811,0.6725438,0.05090556,0.007023176,0.06124859,0.00439774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1151133,0.8024984,0.01349141,0.01039119,0.05641125,0.00209451],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002552526,0.0001839626,0.0008853926,0.02799157,0.0003362946,0.0009218851,0.1629329,0.001774837,0.0006957633,0.4455573,0.09108317,0.2673816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003139179,0.0002862574,0.001224192,0.08384726,0.000182128,0.001021826,0.08070914,0.002102635,0.0008606045,0.3189798,0.5099731,0.0004991619],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001340296,0.2099299,0.03597857,0.7396474,0.00901686,0.0007829088,0.00003664429,0.00006409396,0.003203297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1117957,0.3228931,0.2199136,0.3203881,0.01371976,0.008139666,0.00009665332,0.0004974663,0.002555949],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2920406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3601381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9938323712394778,"score_gpt":0.919250450729603,"score_spread":0.07458192050987478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}