{"id":"W2113661939","doi":"10.3152/147154606781765273","title":"Conceptual frameworks for SIA revisited: a cumulative effects study on lead contamination and economic change","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulative effects; Lead (geology); Resilience (materials science); Conceptual framework; Psychological resilience; Preference; Conceptual model; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Environmental science; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Social science; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03106921,0.001727578,0.001760064,0.009769145,0.007911864,0.01106328,0.004856611,0.00408112,0.004612378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02879675,0.0008368909,0.002568488,0.008186992,0.05205289,0.01677205,0.01252736,0.008711915,0.0002740972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02059182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01237466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01764794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01994874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9814477,0.01432983,0.00052294,0.0008042241,0.001962682,0.0009326538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9505398,0.03981959,0.002461498,0.001859594,0.004175954,0.001143557],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002525283,0.00006697893,0.002247243,0.0002701899,0.0000247147,0.0003644995,0.02873878,0.002990254,0.0001216888,0.953772,0.0005071909,0.01087117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004045426,0.0002761785,0.005910726,0.001139155,0.0001050423,0.0005194388,0.08700108,0.01367495,0.0004336929,0.8534718,0.03731706,0.0001103498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2664258,0.01417961,0.4159097,0.08900031,0.0006897738,0.001346007,0.000267218,0.000188654,0.2119929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639293,0.002345001,0.03010686,0.001041979,0.00006344582,0.000674135,0.00003917262,0.00003223313,0.001767962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03106921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1643117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03102061939364775,"score_gpt":0.3763494990004966,"score_spread":0.3453288796068488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}