{"id":"W2113868498","doi":"10.22621/cfn.v120i3.325","title":"A Conservation Evaluation of Smooth Goosefoot, <em>Chenopodium subglabrum</em> (Chenopodiaceae), in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Field-Naturalist","topic":"Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chenopodium; Germination; Habitat; Chenopodiaceae; Sand dune stabilization; Population; Biology; Ecology; Botany; Agronomy; Demography; Weed","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003978558,0.000204856,0.0002103338,0.001166453,0.002065799,0.0007696368,0.0009951466,0.0002393801,0.001316339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001002198,0.0001253947,0.0001252395,0.002009246,0.0007314215,0.0002180124,0.0003477113,0.0002278749,0.00006317176],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01958631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02000076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9806802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996552,0.00003795587,0.000008334872,0.00004297848,0.0001185375,0.0001368993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990361,0.00004092827,0.00009974117,0.0000168858,0.0004028231,0.0004036462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000844429,0.0004216705,0.8443475,0.0003461761,0.0001106063,0.0009986734,0.004509335,0.001650928,0.004367847,0.001066457,0.004774267,0.1365623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002490883,0.0002150168,0.9880747,0.00003695895,0.00003447734,0.0001178811,0.006565039,0.001023993,0.0002786749,0.00006339497,0.003554125,0.00001087685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967464,0.0004310486,0.00006686141,0.000284639,0.000004833093,0.00006149343,0.000394333,0.000006848861,0.002003622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979851,0.0003087251,0.0003349269,0.00005976029,0.000001361641,0.00001103247,0.0002860978,0.000001559436,0.001011449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01958631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1421093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02619770497720108,"score_gpt":0.2148255049543329,"score_spread":0.1886277999771318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}