{"id":"W2113879869","doi":"10.1109/pess.2002.1043453","title":"Feasibility study of maintenance cost reduction in redundant customer delivery systems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hydro One (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Corrective maintenance; Preventive maintenance; Predictive maintenance; Cost reduction; Maintenance engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Redundancy (engineering); Computer science; Planned maintenance; Proactive maintenance; Work (physics); Risk analysis (engineering); Operations management; Engineering; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008133737,0.0001472188,0.0003275169,0.0001004573,0.00002253835,0.00001376759,0.0001188037,0.00007148066,0.00001745374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008462433,0.000128667,0.00004326368,0.0003467103,0.00004187276,0.0001506822,0.00001331748,0.0001499286,0.00002564168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003171321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002718531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006268965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002696967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985849,0.0001467702,0.0005506739,0.0002610632,0.0001756078,0.0002809525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992925,0.00003224162,0.0000529295,0.0004592875,0.0001044748,0.00005855932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004831592,0.007442109,0.1751388,0.004418244,0.0003935101,0.0001154373,0.01317326,0.7031388,0.03714995,0.03621234,0.01986532,0.002469051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03767859,0.003121963,0.3285539,0.005060421,0.0003519094,0.001264879,0.3054421,0.1535982,0.04674467,0.001513898,0.1093248,0.007344659],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737628,0.0002641316,0.001414745,0.000005671244,0.001399991,0.001346741,0.000004675315,0.0001288133,0.02167246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999253,0.00003596952,0.00006971395,0.000002441474,0.00001356198,0.00008753967,7.374663e-7,0.00001642104,0.0005206484],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5495405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5246887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01929524922373706,"score_gpt":0.2327054515383177,"score_spread":0.2134102023145806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}