{"id":"W2113879869","doi":"10.1109/pess.2002.1043453","title":"Feasibility study of maintenance cost reduction in redundant customer delivery systems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hydro One (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Corrective maintenance; Preventive maintenance; Predictive maintenance; Cost reduction; Maintenance engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Redundancy (engineering); Computer science; Planned maintenance; Proactive maintenance; Work (physics); Risk analysis (engineering); Operations management; Engineering; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002574129,0.0003451089,0.0003513234,0.001028272,0.0003151075,0.0004620368,0.00100321,0.0005552867,0.002593108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008694469,0.0002065741,0.0003237292,0.0004591605,0.0002838668,0.00074972,0.0002909157,0.0003480756,0.000167745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006854443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006465029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001486719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001199289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981833,0.0008939084,0.00005277466,0.0001015691,0.0006360023,0.0001323328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902995,0.007125791,0.0005525379,0.0003329557,0.001494675,0.0001946775],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02295582,0.007232019,0.0552482,0.001785147,0.0001923826,0.002742457,0.0009292523,0.4008649,0.1023583,0.01722162,0.002878842,0.385591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001698228,0.06080763,0.06157151,0.00008212557,0.0004610297,0.001727158,0.001075451,0.8050358,0.05965926,0.003931907,0.003849793,0.000100126],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875903,0.0001033528,0.008706925,0.0001345435,0.00001362763,0.0001755912,0.00006153974,0.00004439974,0.003169707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956099,0.00003525969,0.003959292,0.000008624565,0.000005225355,0.00004529322,0.00003108282,0.000003366672,0.0003018924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002593108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01361346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01929524922373706,"score_gpt":0.2327054515383177,"score_spread":0.2134102023145806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}