{"id":"W2113972884","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.060110","title":"Re-examining the efficacy of  -blockers for the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":220,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale; University of Alberta; St. Paul's Foundation; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada","keywords":"Medicine; Relative risk; Internal medicine; Placebo; Meta-analysis; Confidence interval; Stroke (engine); Myocardial infarction; Clinical trial; Randomized controlled trial; Alternative medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07017677,0.00579489,0.02717438,0.006620591,0.0007424459,0.006065791,0.003702344,0.002988438,0.003979788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1233685,0.002281395,0.07607793,0.006052511,0.0009752505,0.002822304,0.001769057,0.004253414,0.0005688377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002905784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002711716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006765252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01059825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9286532,0.05092319,0.01038989,0.005410569,0.003673272,0.000949867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8901681,0.09127466,0.006923656,0.006423822,0.004513177,0.0006965821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002495404,0.00001558077,0.003322111,0.01902515,0.9682848,0.00009390926,0.00002908527,0.0006840037,0.0001238735,0.0001072905,0.0006738338,0.005144909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00143571,0.0001610973,0.002437598,0.0026141,0.9912718,0.00007079233,0.00001839011,0.0004838876,0.00009327947,0.0004534822,0.0009408116,0.00001908083],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01406532,0.9744185,0.005133103,0.001738069,0.001939171,0.0003869671,0.001341816,0.0001716058,0.0008055628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6847476,0.2864377,0.01288206,0.007819775,0.002967951,0.001463819,0.002335289,0.0003170087,0.001028673],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07017677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3711346,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1763443922634123,"score_gpt":0.3446969001218402,"score_spread":0.1683525078584278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}