{"id":"W2114042274","doi":"10.15353/cfs-rcea.v2i2.94","title":"LGAR - Land grabs, the agrarian question and the corporate food regime","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Food Studies / La Revue canadienne des études sur l alimentation","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Land grabbing; Agrarian society; Capitalism; Scholarship; Civil society; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political economy; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law; Geography; Agriculture; Biology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008313645,0.0002349728,0.0002549792,0.00002614217,0.000727216,0.0001476872,0.0002364159,0.00008247565,0.00000579199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001861476,0.00007793429,0.00005647093,0.000400899,0.0003458216,0.000172078,0.00005565257,0.0001315182,0.00000576044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005019445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007088949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1132858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9828203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985221,0.0003027781,0.0002652709,0.0003152133,0.0001232763,0.0004713656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987026,0.0002597368,0.0001937879,0.00009103888,0.0003005829,0.0004522653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005210024,0.0001508473,0.160234,0.0002100672,0.003532008,0.000178121,0.07667539,0.0001973271,0.0003382006,0.6465642,0.0379442,0.07345454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002572714,0.001529951,0.7545151,0.0002326829,0.0003665005,0.000266432,0.04102815,0.00005125178,0.0001967837,0.06545395,0.1327778,0.001008681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888029,0.002990547,5.667408e-7,0.006726515,0.0002495713,0.0005749696,0.0001477679,0.00003399027,0.0004732434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979362,0.000405129,0.00003249954,0.0007458251,0.0001567523,0.000122467,0.0002743938,0.000002696533,0.0003240407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8695345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8926188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06896285667300953,"score_gpt":0.2116091976498741,"score_spread":0.1426463409768645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}