{"id":"W2114134447","doi":"10.1890/02-5195","title":"USE OF POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS AND RESERVE SELECTION ALGORITHMS IN REGIONAL CONSERVATION PLANS","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Nature Conservancy; World Wildlife Fund; Wilburforce Foundation","keywords":"Population; Population viability analysis; Nature reserve; Carnivore; Ecology; Biodiversity; Selection (genetic algorithm); Protected area; Geography; Population model; Population size; Landscape connectivity; Environmental resource management; Endangered species; Biology; Habitat; Environmental science; Computer science; Biological dispersal","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003814353,0.00006899246,0.0001381539,0.0000738656,0.0001140587,0.000009063318,0.00005278686,0.0001262678,0.000456343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001818406,0.00006563639,0.00003555344,0.001037387,0.0001316703,0.0001921223,0.00002496891,0.0000932462,0.00001259594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001040674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007676658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001392757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01272055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990577,0.0001722017,0.0002824238,0.0002750585,0.00009889559,0.0001137342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993423,0.0003552557,0.0001178676,0.0001271978,0.00001949295,0.00003795281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008552152,0.0001738328,0.9932948,0.000001925637,0.00001282899,1.047754e-7,0.0000181076,0.001962559,0.0001640697,0.0038155,0.0001112571,0.0004364102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001030631,0.00003339451,0.9825113,6.658538e-7,0.00003542108,0.000001308248,0.00001213723,0.008434107,0.00003995457,0.007147279,0.001616287,0.00006511553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922964,0.000002789192,0.006310046,0.0007668866,0.000007705503,0.0003993997,0.000008022979,0.00002017061,0.0001885602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923361,0.000009599428,0.006947192,0.0003024866,0.000005074744,0.0002479702,0.00008659556,0.000002381747,0.00006263246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7098368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03443744902698478,"score_gpt":0.2549742007463897,"score_spread":0.2205367517194049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}