{"id":"W2114140119","doi":"10.1109/icfem.2000.873808","title":"SPIN vs. VIS: a case study on the formal verification of the ATMR protocol","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Formal Methods in Verification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Asynchronous communication; Interleaving; Formal verification; Protocol (science); Software verification; Software; Model checking; Formal methods; Intelligent verification; Promela; High-level verification; Functional verification; Communications protocol; Verification; Embedded system; Computer hardware; Software system; Theoretical computer science; Programming language; Operating system; Computer network; Software construction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009960524,0.00009684164,0.00008392862,0.00003562353,0.000230889,0.00006679253,0.001017399,0.00003286205,0.00004190136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001357863,0.0000476945,0.00005066129,0.0004740441,0.00005720456,0.0004135899,0.0001852463,0.0001307804,0.00005047703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003411747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001568541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005692336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001012813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986911,0.0003211834,0.0002861191,0.0002136411,0.0003290309,0.0001589608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982863,0.00007636572,0.0001816432,0.001353003,0.00007783653,0.00002483891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000875878,0.00351842,0.003758746,0.00008239812,0.00006481557,0.00005524983,0.02985936,0.0003612781,0.00169553,0.7149367,0.003782911,0.241797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001736409,0.00259188,0.0440897,0.0000546075,0.00002158488,0.0005208942,0.004237159,0.8812461,0.05466025,0.0007956103,0.009603154,0.0004426347],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3887015,0.000002909606,0.4331064,0.00252381,0.0003989355,0.1559196,0.000001650358,0.0002455879,0.01909968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9347336,1.376321e-7,0.03311821,0.0002450215,0.00002295994,0.0316506,4.273272e-8,0.00000550126,0.0002239085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8808848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1944925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08978592293705602,"score_gpt":0.3503049249776166,"score_spread":0.2605190020405606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}