{"id":"W2114168672","doi":"10.1007/s00184-007-0124-9","title":"Empirical likelihood for average derivatives of hazard regression functions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metrika","topic":"Statistical Methods and Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematics; Empirical likelihood; Covariate; Statistics; Regression analysis; Monte Carlo method; Hazard ratio; Inference; Applied mathematics; Econometrics; Confidence interval; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001061075,0.0000992101,0.0002541886,0.0001416702,0.00006963448,0.00000898192,0.00009326742,0.00007872486,0.0001992865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01065052,0.0000712964,0.00008862314,0.0003776415,0.00005852582,0.00003299764,0.00003525538,0.00009727516,0.000007603036],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002278955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000282866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002653067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004491992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990331,0.00006373744,0.0003423528,0.0001591607,0.0001850404,0.0002166046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939661,0.005465277,0.0001230951,0.0001977371,0.0001636025,0.00008418217],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006352039,0.001320063,0.02604811,0.0007113779,0.0002032296,0.00001248392,0.001988819,0.000001713526,0.02418076,0.2820717,0.04474039,0.6180862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001131114,0.0007292606,0.04785081,0.0001604341,0.00008928997,0.000004537395,0.0003943363,0.0005714041,0.07756216,0.8552477,0.0159677,0.0002912185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.09079324,0.00006578548,0.9051676,0.0000972359,0.0001746297,0.0001846103,0.00003680807,0.0000322095,0.003447893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3486065,0.000004641673,0.6508056,0.00005686648,0.00007401001,0.00001111318,0.00000257014,0.00001279742,0.0004259351],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6177949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1596316112238186,"score_gpt":0.4447488618463279,"score_spread":0.2851172506225094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}