{"id":"W2114264853","doi":"10.1007/s11367-012-0451-6","title":"Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":364,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Footprinting; Carbon accounting; Key (lock); Life-cycle assessment; Carbon fibers; Environmental science; Business; Computer science; Chemistry; Greenhouse gas; Economics; Carbon dioxide; Production (economics); Geology; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01240884,0.001257105,0.001712751,0.00181949,0.001770504,0.009685082,0.003552638,0.007041303,0.007341259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03518537,0.0007749962,0.001306088,0.004067226,0.005335173,0.02409659,0.002693043,0.007345038,0.0005808821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003544159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003922414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008498319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008219386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951894,0.002245232,0.0005930581,0.0007099241,0.0009697814,0.0002926274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857961,0.009897751,0.001300803,0.0008464335,0.001757189,0.0004016906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001239656,0.00006003252,0.00136881,0.0003227688,0.00006965554,0.0001783197,0.0001848402,0.03516145,0.0004408691,0.9206537,0.003718225,0.03771743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000962369,0.00001715648,0.0006121602,0.0001412735,0.00003052677,0.00005312693,0.0002608453,0.03047997,0.0005423992,0.9625313,0.005277396,0.00004403306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1763521,0.07776386,0.3993343,0.2498573,0.005302784,0.0003320942,0.002297651,0.0002790642,0.08848082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9214676,0.01400816,0.04825293,0.001640495,0.002521176,0.00014433,0.000235062,0.00009029941,0.01163983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01240884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06562501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08451357361148666,"score_gpt":0.3439744981313222,"score_spread":0.2594609245198356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}