{"id":"W2114646553","doi":"10.1109/cibcb.2006.330959","title":"Optimization of the Sliding Window Size for Protein Structure Prediction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Protein Structure and Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sliding window protocol; Window (computing); Protein structure prediction; Protein secondary structure; Sequence (biology); Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Algorithm; Protein structure; Biological system; Artificial intelligence; Chemistry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003780324,0.00006781245,0.00005646624,0.000007790101,0.00005804228,0.00000771111,0.00008962955,0.0001096434,0.000009736997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005479519,0.0000453984,0.0000547477,0.00004874291,0.00002128773,0.000002304415,0.00003156447,0.00002873022,3.619076e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006127479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002738633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001520357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002721236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995906,0.00001377011,0.0001208155,0.0001260306,0.00006368754,0.00008509681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999679,0.000003821319,0.00007214512,0.0001679724,0.00006734441,0.000009774297],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003184189,0.000005951619,0.001015536,0.00001628733,0.000008657729,1.795517e-8,0.00000294753,0.0322982,0.9648633,0.001320927,0.0002768028,0.0001595359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003935369,0.00007903374,0.002469304,0.000008060453,0.00001270719,0.000002840103,0.000008388576,0.005653196,0.9882021,0.001982406,0.001119397,0.00006906003],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7286873,0.00006388067,0.2688358,0.0001064098,0.0001271547,0.0008509596,0.0001169166,0.00001226315,0.001199265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780052,0.000001269532,0.02074124,0.00004127534,0.0001830257,0.00002054173,0.00008592174,0.000009378204,0.0009120963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2493179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1851293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.002660111671391299,"score_gpt":0.1913130522731334,"score_spread":0.1886529406017421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}