{"id":"W2114688767","doi":"10.5194/nhess-14-95-2014","title":"Assessing the quality of landslide susceptibility maps – case study Lower Austria","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural hazards and earth system sciences","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":252,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Austrian Institute of Technology; Amt der NÖ Landesregierung","keywords":"Thematic map; Landslide; Consistency (knowledge bases); Sampling (signal processing); Quality (philosophy); Confidence interval; Cartography; Statistics; Data mining; Computer science; Geology; Geography; Mathematics; Geomorphology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002557882,0.0005031409,0.0005963541,0.001604425,0.0003437035,0.001147682,0.0007824104,0.0006194645,0.0006401525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007116831,0.0002639626,0.0006655881,0.001660032,0.0005330322,0.0006588481,0.0008210459,0.0003959272,0.0001306024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001773643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006537997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02733207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02047116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987682,0.0006734429,0.0000845399,0.0001475042,0.0002068424,0.0001195136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970165,0.00180204,0.0003523267,0.0003222346,0.000403111,0.000103726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002560916,0.0002686038,0.1508586,0.0001294351,0.0001420091,0.001392057,0.0007792629,0.8153434,0.001815642,0.002079741,0.0004341611,0.02650092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000432648,0.0002107907,0.07230436,0.00007745327,0.00007801899,0.0003133793,0.001272969,0.9190677,0.00319142,0.002063696,0.001329991,0.00004686954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945946,0.00003802464,0.004349064,0.00004493359,0.000002302453,0.00002627859,0.0001818589,0.00004042429,0.0007225213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968579,0.0000300485,0.002717697,0.000003547309,0.000001070259,0.00001215349,0.0002093781,0.000007260525,0.0001610488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02733207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05434597,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02585486251336824,"score_gpt":0.3180644323533633,"score_spread":0.2922095698399951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}