{"id":"W2114688767","doi":"10.5194/nhess-14-95-2014","title":"Assessing the quality of landslide susceptibility maps – case study Lower Austria","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural hazards and earth system sciences","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":252,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Austrian Institute of Technology; Amt der NÖ Landesregierung","keywords":"Thematic map; Landslide; Consistency (knowledge bases); Sampling (signal processing); Quality (philosophy); Confidence interval; Cartography; Statistics; Data mining; Computer science; Geology; Geography; Mathematics; Geomorphology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005233085,0.0001560756,0.0002941779,0.00002943855,0.000753254,0.0002234503,0.0002810842,0.00007941423,0.00009015381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001032072,0.00007423601,0.00007924875,0.0003945496,0.0006439108,0.0003738008,0.0001965713,0.0002151918,0.00001322639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003027109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002793789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005295878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001566726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976677,0.0004750879,0.000446128,0.0004334548,0.000681616,0.0002960502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990805,0.000271284,0.0002245779,0.0003028985,0.00002798201,0.00009272358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004321138,0.0001855484,0.8722584,0.00009449787,0.00004266659,0.0001172504,0.002190255,0.0008212284,0.001262644,0.0005010909,0.0003316363,0.1221516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002652474,0.001569582,0.8373057,0.0002278858,0.0001519659,0.001853598,0.092334,0.05914125,0.0004176725,0.0002545851,0.003112223,0.0009790531],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99356,0.0001204518,0.00004053641,0.0001171714,0.0005622945,0.0003065479,0.000003875813,0.0000315779,0.005257573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999504,0.000003302695,0.0001901179,0.0000268851,0.00006320685,0.000003621156,6.984985e-7,0.000004060788,0.0002040543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1211725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8005818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02585486251336824,"score_gpt":0.3180644323533633,"score_spread":0.2922095698399951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}