{"id":"W2114795669","doi":"10.22230/jem.2004v4n2a281","title":"Assessing the relative quality of old-growth forest: An example from the Robson Valley, British Columbia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Forest management; Geography; Wildlife; Old-growth forest; Forestry; Coarse woody debris; Ecology; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008869793,0.00005521044,0.0001906645,0.000003832937,0.0004970527,0.000211387,0.0002195067,0.00004003198,0.00003405596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002509229,0.00002159709,0.00008156437,0.0000799285,0.00008087223,0.0002678173,0.000113772,0.00009199987,7.63143e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002351784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003235144,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1469374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4943258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992065,0.000114993,0.0003022708,0.0001087229,0.0001599798,0.0001075706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991975,0.0002124423,0.0003976079,0.00004271188,0.0001170961,0.00003257917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004098057,0.000290348,0.9776942,0.00005370998,0.0006105228,0.00004521395,0.00132973,0.00003790158,0.0002785609,0.006617154,0.006904401,0.006097249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003336988,0.0002293575,0.982256,0.0000863016,0.00005460364,0.000008775878,0.005934843,0.000004489562,0.000003467782,0.008418654,0.002616173,0.0000536674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975523,0.0004099715,0.00002499505,0.001344849,0.000163747,0.0001711464,0.00001461695,0.000004083181,0.0003142805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990368,0.0004252733,0.0001104073,0.0001786223,0.0001136669,0.000001836017,0.000004268564,3.626101e-7,0.0001287078],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3473883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8587432,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05390980071787678,"score_gpt":0.2448174839435008,"score_spread":0.190907683225624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}