{"id":"W2114840699","doi":"10.1080/10349120802681564","title":"Reading Recovery and Evidence‐based Practice: A response to Reynolds and Wheldall (2007)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Disability Development and Education","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Reading (process); Intervention (counseling); Perspective (graphical); Cost effectiveness; Literacy; Psychology; Medical education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology; Nursing; Political science; Risk analysis (engineering)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002164189,0.0001211681,0.0001532268,0.00020871,0.0000733626,0.0001687993,0.0001250687,0.0000607553,0.00006076317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001819108,0.0001089919,0.00002399703,0.00009192336,0.00005165578,0.000594371,0.0000271148,0.0001341716,0.000007448547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003003677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003939521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002175672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001467857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986032,0.0001855403,0.0005326326,0.0002348911,0.0003078527,0.0001358495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982913,0.0007421823,0.0002620323,0.0001027472,0.0004276338,0.0001740812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00523007,0.0005997543,0.07973212,0.00002081831,0.0001195877,0.0000117338,0.01894865,0.000003744032,0.0006529118,0.0005992933,0.005329509,0.8887518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004734558,0.0003061284,0.9206445,0.000645077,0.00002156512,0.00026127,0.002808344,0.000004752622,0.0002273253,0.0008135545,0.07362421,0.0001697714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9647543,0.0008231231,0.0003471913,0.03188155,0.001397043,0.0001313641,8.376423e-7,0.000008836479,0.0006557002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737821,0.0001027398,0.02266343,0.002403709,0.0002088327,0.000009736234,0.000003228598,0.000005824657,0.0008204066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8885821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4444562,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03012682853998622,"score_gpt":0.3888442402064089,"score_spread":0.3587174116664227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}