{"id":"W2115099528","doi":"10.1111/hir.12041","title":"Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Information & Libraries Journal","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; MEDLINE; Adverse effect; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Intensive care medicine; Pharmacology; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3922684,0.006499359,0.02771045,0.0703396,0.001695178,0.01085361,0.005964557,0.005472411,0.01785369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7494212,0.003423124,0.04138157,0.06094382,0.00338415,0.01320183,0.01063769,0.004711645,0.001837102],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01454871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01705002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005401425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01275328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2505087,0.5172773,0.1876672,0.008092349,0.03483443,0.001620119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1720829,0.752733,0.03980533,0.01040953,0.02350775,0.001461481],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005753342,0.00009991066,0.00249527,0.823112,0.1071178,0.0001237488,0.001307419,0.001234464,0.0003151148,0.001705309,0.001650917,0.05508463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01981885,0.004517173,0.01669231,0.5947495,0.3211308,0.0007897305,0.002268029,0.00493944,0.001045018,0.01164953,0.02176476,0.0006348459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01558378,0.8856422,0.03782465,0.002820424,0.001958923,0.04377698,0.008038662,0.0006549362,0.003699472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1366023,0.5276477,0.1583135,0.003896316,0.0008763309,0.1626468,0.008380078,0.000624551,0.001012492],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9722896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7494413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6608836379610273,"score_gpt":0.549570388502892,"score_spread":0.1113132494581354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}