{"id":"W2115252875","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x02370079","title":"Symmetry and human spatial cognition: An alternative perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Categorization, perception, and language","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Wynn; Perspective (graphical); Cognition; Formative assessment; Symmetry (geometry); Spatial cognition; Cognitive science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience; Philosophy; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001142303,0.0003719734,0.0005817126,0.001211527,0.0004720035,0.003012103,0.001008223,0.001974911,0.007900838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002167771,0.0001845254,0.0005715186,0.0008482085,0.007976339,0.008033024,0.001559894,0.001385287,0.000512264],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009944168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007049173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002815542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002131137,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999595,0.0001379207,0.00002193148,0.00009283676,0.00009696992,0.00005532261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991128,0.000416906,0.0000971634,0.0001599168,0.0001398381,0.00007333194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005163311,0.00002032077,0.0007577654,0.0000463436,0.0000170802,0.00007796151,0.0007517932,0.000626069,0.0003636707,0.9840704,0.0008355755,0.01238129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001596064,0.00002509633,0.0008432643,0.00002170554,0.000006685723,0.0001147524,0.0003489529,0.001102887,0.00008652452,0.9920371,0.005387979,0.000009160271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2757105,0.0365026,0.1292256,0.1290413,0.00131948,0.00005329085,0.0006058854,0.0002197333,0.4273217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796799,0.004057967,0.008792347,0.001876265,0.0005901518,0.00002247664,0.00007901988,0.00001400601,0.004887844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007900838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0264309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08921344523389067,"score_gpt":0.3974281467368345,"score_spread":0.3082147015029438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}