{"id":"W2115252875","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x02370079","title":"Symmetry and human spatial cognition: An alternative perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Categorization, perception, and language","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Wynn; Perspective (graphical); Cognition; Formative assessment; Symmetry (geometry); Spatial cognition; Cognitive science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience; Philosophy; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001623362,0.0000903039,0.00008832949,0.00009520034,0.0004488886,0.0001081171,0.00008502478,0.00004731591,0.003374637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007399847,0.00007423206,0.00001761779,0.0001651705,0.0006309301,0.0002552991,0.00002112387,0.00006216635,0.00002217032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001112415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004774361,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004562085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001094298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991834,0.00007280731,0.00009887879,0.0003469155,0.0001452293,0.0001527524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997283,0.00002384949,0.00004192265,0.00007128773,0.00005313571,0.00008154575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000440976,0.001924225,0.328477,0.00001250524,0.00003329661,0.0001005527,0.2651253,8.434512e-7,0.01176268,0.2566404,0.003693675,0.1321854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001033528,0.001604744,0.9169752,0.00001284778,0.000054137,0.0001306506,0.07147427,0.0001081146,0.0001459142,0.007299866,0.0007685155,0.0003922094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868342,0.0002153855,0.00007402099,0.0003868961,0.0001755993,0.0001051627,0.000018631,0.00003488758,0.01215523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975917,0.000009825302,0.00005280319,0.0002100746,0.0002424126,0.00001025083,0.00001031821,0.000004504432,0.001868166],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5884982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08921344523389067,"score_gpt":0.3974281467368345,"score_spread":0.3082147015029438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}