{"id":"W2115268893","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.09.006","title":"Assessment of anatomical frame variation effect on joint angles: A linear perturbation approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biomechanics","topic":"Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Kingston General Hospital; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Universities Space Research Association","keywords":"Joint (building); Interpretability; Kinematics; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Physics; Structural engineering; Artificial intelligence; Classical mechanics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004501518,0.0005295613,0.0004166007,0.000813964,0.0001824802,0.00031371,0.000228044,0.0003807309,0.00289916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001853898,0.0002108599,0.0004359854,0.0007688642,0.0002986088,0.0002445416,0.0003124767,0.0002776757,0.0003581737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001519352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002771586,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001352969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001449518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995647,0.0001300164,0.00002209709,0.00008600923,0.0001479878,0.0000491807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992811,0.0004125072,0.00005239771,0.00006983866,0.0001545423,0.00002965339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004096521,0.0007333725,0.009949251,0.0005045611,0.000172448,0.0003822877,0.000309319,0.08254317,0.665736,0.000973872,0.0005304544,0.2340688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001220996,0.004393817,0.1626426,0.00005490365,0.0003973733,0.001255599,0.0003536386,0.6664793,0.1614435,0.001084474,0.001664874,0.0001078984],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7133319,0.0001980497,0.2819369,0.0000494882,0.00005052075,0.000195147,0.0003499813,0.0004170527,0.003471045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968676,0.0001186379,0.02987172,0.00001495713,0.00001254994,0.00007365299,0.0001623496,0.00007025102,0.0009998954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00289916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009698689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03052801210777014,"score_gpt":0.2407775134149853,"score_spread":0.2102495013072151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}