{"id":"W2115268893","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.09.006","title":"Assessment of anatomical frame variation effect on joint angles: A linear perturbation approach","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biomechanics","topic":"Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Kingston General Hospital; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Universities Space Research Association","keywords":"Joint (building); Interpretability; Kinematics; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Physics; Structural engineering; Artificial intelligence; Classical mechanics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007358103,0.0001527438,0.0003362966,0.000357528,0.00002346301,0.00001397793,0.000168255,0.0001958692,0.00006789855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007774425,0.0001182832,0.0001716667,0.0002675343,0.00001180091,0.0001112633,0.00002729338,0.0002811207,0.000003382468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001157443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003365885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002194203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.59915e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988798,0.00006484246,0.0004848286,0.0001118111,0.0003087892,0.0001498526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992816,0.00006678551,0.0002782697,0.0001812384,0.0001245201,0.00006757131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001613025,0.0008490806,0.00004301304,0.0005601341,0.0004718314,0.00005314657,0.002111793,0.0007493665,0.9091617,0.01620684,0.0008057766,0.06882598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006884242,0.00216014,0.0005180193,0.00012445,0.00008190166,0.00006541235,0.0000984621,0.8839917,0.107755,0.004066139,0.0002361479,0.0002142416],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4949322,0.0001636046,0.501447,0.000020091,0.001249438,0.0002397318,0.00007845154,0.00008207989,0.001787373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697828,0.00008125679,0.02997566,0.00002010019,0.00009598264,0.000003429551,0.00001240416,0.00002223737,0.000006075409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8832423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4823451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03052801210777014,"score_gpt":0.2407775134149853,"score_spread":0.2102495013072151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}