{"id":"W2115304976","doi":"10.1139/x10-006","title":"Assessing forest management strategies under a mountain pine beetle attack in Alberta: exploring the impacts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western Forest Products; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Mountain pine beetle; Forest management; Forest inventory; Revenue; Stock (firearms); Dendroctonus; Forest structure; Business; Environmental resource management; Forestry; Geography; Environmental science; Finance; Bark beetle","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00220533,0.0001508957,0.000157585,0.0005697524,0.0004102514,0.0007652793,0.0008988063,0.00005766351,0.001246211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001476519,0.0001090465,0.00007097465,0.000909542,0.0005598469,0.001507762,0.0001552215,0.001002727,0.0003358207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004741188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003566951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1597161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9416217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977424,0.0001331993,0.0003481701,0.000187464,0.0006313788,0.0009573701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987518,0.0001951489,0.00009577315,0.0003537606,0.0000411658,0.0005623334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000292072,0.00004935535,0.8992878,0.00004569438,0.00004856876,0.0005641319,0.001608037,0.03855389,0.0001603524,0.03482079,0.02022813,0.004604066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004030773,0.00009142599,0.9485621,0.00007293795,0.000008368913,0.00003911716,0.001648248,0.0005676816,0.00001140983,0.006077159,0.04237887,0.0001395609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9435516,0.00003212947,0.00001490404,0.003460529,0.0002385469,0.000242598,0.000001012542,0.00000287402,0.05245582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997228,0.00003405828,0.0001725196,0.0001077611,0.0002049467,0.00001834531,0.000002108227,0.00002325153,0.002208962],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7819055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996668,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09544940912630247,"score_gpt":0.3613880132374397,"score_spread":0.2659386041111373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}