{"id":"W2115314542","doi":"10.2166/wh.2006.0014","title":"Identification of human fecal pollution sources in a coastal area: a case study at Oostende (Belgium)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water and Health","topic":"Fecal contamination and water quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fecal coliform; Bacteroides; Feces; Pollution; Sampling (signal processing); Indicator bacteria; Biology; Human feces; Veterinary medicine; Environmental science; Water quality; Environmental pollution; Microbiology; Ecology; Bacteria; Environmental protection; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004830479,0.0004223597,0.0003496355,0.00068213,0.001115901,0.0007611627,0.0004167267,0.0009177807,0.0006557279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001035283,0.000345989,0.0002703918,0.0008650685,0.0006467726,0.0003261745,0.0004787002,0.0003391039,0.0001156336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009343361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006010139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03690235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06609725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995011,0.0001495959,0.00003523016,0.0001130945,0.0001097828,0.00009112908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994152,0.0001269718,0.0001751444,0.00004567659,0.0001028125,0.0001342159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006179798,0.0008227669,0.8817983,0.0002642922,0.0001170667,0.06951428,0.009063043,0.0008200303,0.01109538,0.0001284205,0.0004757243,0.02528272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007305335,0.002656643,0.9081326,0.00009276348,0.0001262473,0.05227281,0.02162012,0.001497499,0.008264009,0.0001291322,0.00506937,0.0000657518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995216,0.00006290474,0.0001301204,0.0000281218,0.000001309515,0.0000165392,0.00003438307,0.000002033999,0.0002029295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981312,0.0002707184,0.0008669787,0.0000399243,0.000004870032,0.00001815199,0.00008094049,0.000002701971,0.0005845146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03690235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07337511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03889728680393192,"score_gpt":0.3162397728367817,"score_spread":0.2773424860328498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}