{"id":"W2115314542","doi":"10.2166/wh.2006.0014","title":"Identification of human fecal pollution sources in a coastal area: a case study at Oostende (Belgium)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water and Health","topic":"Fecal contamination and water quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fecal coliform; Bacteroides; Feces; Pollution; Sampling (signal processing); Indicator bacteria; Biology; Human feces; Veterinary medicine; Environmental science; Water quality; Environmental pollution; Microbiology; Ecology; Bacteria; Environmental protection; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001361525,0.00005888201,0.0001627534,0.00007038039,0.000116225,0.00001598758,0.00004483483,0.0000231191,0.00004543487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002661667,0.00003916047,0.00002968126,0.0000550898,0.00005626046,0.0001417777,0.00005029859,0.00008225311,0.00000259151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001607033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007610318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008567501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01848962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988272,0.0001444031,0.0005957168,0.00009271444,0.0002123455,0.0001276051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996257,0.000006736387,0.0002341311,0.00005731337,0.00001385638,0.00006226284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005705387,0.0006924389,0.9595069,0.00004000867,0.000006239641,0.0001831094,0.01185463,0.0001334887,0.02599229,0.00002078419,0.0002784084,0.001234608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001084,0.0005600688,0.9900659,0.00001354416,0.000007987427,0.0005111982,0.002421082,0.00009066155,0.004856192,0.0002580046,0.00007410497,0.00005723057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988974,0.00002385754,0.0000769192,0.0007725921,0.00003455058,0.0001282137,0.000003535311,0.000002402182,0.00006048784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996137,0.000003366089,0.00001233724,0.00006385627,0.00002412351,0.000001019599,0.000002684679,0.000003006531,0.0002759273],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03055899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03889728680393192,"score_gpt":0.3162397728367817,"score_spread":0.2773424860328498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}