{"id":"W2115479594","doi":"10.1146/annurev.physchem.56.092503.141319","title":"QUANTUM CHAOS MEETS COHERENT CONTROL","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Annual Review of Physical Chemistry","topic":"Quantum chaos and dynamical systems","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Quantum chaos; CHAOS (operating system); Control of chaos; Quantum; Coherent control; Physics; Variety (cybernetics); Synchronization of chaos; Coherent states; Statistical physics; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Quantum dynamics; Control (management); Quantum mechanics; Computer science; Mathematics; Control theory (sociology); Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002141864,0.0008268221,0.004584937,0.000019765,0.00005521811,0.00002112657,0.0006782524,0.0001819537,0.0005001219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003751517,0.0005890726,0.002535484,0.000287024,0.0001520056,0.00007833896,0.0001298503,0.0006471464,0.0002174723],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009537343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003976195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006612596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.466275e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968463,0.0001204924,0.001308952,0.0006739853,0.0005408122,0.0005094725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973039,0.0002521974,0.00117931,0.0007710104,0.0001956646,0.0002978941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003210964,0.0006812608,7.13743e-7,0.5971169,0.0005830664,0.00000550076,0.00002433324,0.000001284024,0.00002748825,0.01234004,0.001080601,0.3881356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002753168,0.00004447064,1.113101e-7,0.227605,0.001116595,0.000003136919,0.00001212755,0.00003431825,0.00002463631,0.0005863652,0.7697794,0.0005185485],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006140047,0.9922014,0.00009408397,0.00004444001,0.00008364059,0.001046775,0.001796953,0.00003606152,0.004690533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003167137,0.9941906,0.000004901103,0.00003740685,0.001294396,0.0003306493,0.000645455,0.00008424537,0.0002451916],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7686988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01102385499009948,"score_gpt":0.3086242665233069,"score_spread":0.2976004115332074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}