{"id":"W2115531692","doi":"10.6018/ijes.1.2.48231","title":"WORD PROCESSING AND SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING: A LONGITUDINAL CASE STUDY","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Word (group theory); Computer science; Word processing; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Think aloud protocol; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Human–computer interaction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00266756,0.0005042377,0.0004503523,0.00137631,0.004149762,0.001631081,0.0006984686,0.001342066,0.0018281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009738729,0.0003715544,0.0004449223,0.0008935754,0.001180556,0.001401932,0.001814566,0.001864,0.0005900557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001088515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001223462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004420105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007020988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984675,0.000653718,0.0001216781,0.0002274182,0.0002707724,0.0002588799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935225,0.002289396,0.001565407,0.0007225151,0.0009278636,0.0009724172],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006341225,0.005983126,0.5525396,0.0002180985,0.00005419687,0.1208125,0.252436,0.0003075112,0.007119205,0.001473559,0.001421522,0.05700071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002509143,0.01206245,0.39914,0.0004480691,0.0001802392,0.3217744,0.2117734,0.003673971,0.01629359,0.003955152,0.03013542,0.0003124168],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985206,0.0001671544,0.0003366572,0.0001373049,0.000007800055,0.00003317546,0.00002380413,0.00001092178,0.0007627012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967939,0.0002475086,0.0007520367,0.0001214126,0.0000183209,0.00006927647,0.00007329373,0.000009599587,0.001914648],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004420105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01410758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2934033939287063,"score_gpt":0.5962388893699356,"score_spread":0.3028354954412293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}