{"id":"W2115662433","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2010.487108","title":"Is Geriatric Depression Scale-15 a suitable instrument for measuring depression in Brazil? Results of a Rasch analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychology Health & Medicine","topic":"Aging and Gerontology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Douglas Mental Health University Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Rasch model; Differential item functioning; Geriatric Depression Scale; Scale (ratio); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Sample (material); Item response theory; Depression (economics); Psychiatry; Depressive symptoms; Developmental psychology; Cognition","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008658667,0.0003369703,0.0009316409,0.001493681,0.0003385564,0.0008499043,0.0003970524,0.0002969667,0.0008013716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02498769,0.0002467598,0.0008643738,0.001885842,0.0005431077,0.0007370271,0.0005878351,0.0004501889,0.000217137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005437889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001193575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005041103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0093999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961117,0.00181074,0.0006333068,0.0003265068,0.0009645059,0.0001533041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937191,0.002716666,0.001386499,0.0005645433,0.001405233,0.0002079954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001150639,0.00007061338,0.8875421,0.0005570065,0.0004480545,0.000124413,0.002034919,0.0003331393,0.001385668,0.0008352703,0.001787833,0.1047659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003410278,0.0001982154,0.9912771,0.0003658387,0.0002053333,0.0002598599,0.001374692,0.001368032,0.0002099748,0.0007570258,0.00393233,0.00001757003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618596,0.009737704,0.01224975,0.002771672,0.0002051562,0.0006302932,0.002219786,0.0001202972,0.01020581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988161,0.001571344,0.008863127,0.0001826155,0.00003283082,0.0002150887,0.0007536205,0.00001483311,0.0002055144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008658667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04579192,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07797621451925653,"score_gpt":0.4736363177856395,"score_spread":0.395660103266383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}