{"id":"W2115662433","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2010.487108","title":"Is Geriatric Depression Scale-15 a suitable instrument for measuring depression in Brazil? Results of a Rasch analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychology Health & Medicine","topic":"Aging and Gerontology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Douglas Mental Health University Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Rasch model; Differential item functioning; Geriatric Depression Scale; Scale (ratio); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Sample (material); Item response theory; Depression (economics); Psychiatry; Depressive symptoms; Developmental psychology; Cognition","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005503905,0.0002786678,0.001153107,0.001503506,0.0001984967,0.000004711348,0.0005114009,0.0005581207,0.0006860681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005389299,0.0002221603,0.0001512997,0.001552069,0.0003532669,0.00006512861,0.00006782428,0.001104446,0.0000274384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006171247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001378747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003483656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003218469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953539,0.0006102377,0.001387313,0.001109029,0.0004205682,0.001119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968854,0.0007102289,0.0005820861,0.001238398,0.0001883491,0.0003955278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003944291,0.0006497801,0.8773828,0.0001663058,0.0003123088,0.00001397933,0.009471181,0.000004426498,0.001887612,0.00005465867,0.04726649,0.05884616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01479046,0.0007580105,0.9762058,0.0001623908,0.000175802,0.00006063581,0.0007480734,0.0002373588,0.0002295553,0.0002845708,0.006127905,0.0002194812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9566631,0.004000494,0.003354086,0.02323171,0.001856532,0.001122731,0.0000446968,0.0000674761,0.009659136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939295,0.00009887331,0.001383243,0.002693545,0.0003019648,0.0002725859,0.0000717633,0.00003185428,0.001216684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09882296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9059434,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07797621451925653,"score_gpt":0.4736363177856395,"score_spread":0.395660103266383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}