{"id":"W2115766995","doi":"10.1007/s10278-004-1906-5","title":"Designing Better Radiology Workstations: Impact of Two User Interfaces on Interpretation Errors and User Satisfaction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Digital Imaging","topic":"Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Workflow; Computer science; Workstation; Task (project management); Interpretation (philosophy); Presentation (obstetrics); Human–computer interaction; User interface; Interface (matter); Reading (process); Set (abstract data type); Shell (structure); Radiology; Medicine; Programming language; Operating system; Database","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005822059,0.001216364,0.001039454,0.0009846864,0.0004724073,0.002831195,0.0009700902,0.002351797,0.004109808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07036705,0.0007711187,0.001011589,0.0005938805,0.0004240545,0.002043943,0.001376867,0.0009032902,0.0006194757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004220092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004576342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009854096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008449648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937509,0.003165561,0.0009520298,0.0004862938,0.001258859,0.0003864692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8600625,0.1202689,0.005673828,0.003578556,0.007582413,0.002833629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.057399,0.01249102,0.225629,0.002879969,0.0009933381,0.002012766,0.01396116,0.0113779,0.1337659,0.000389163,0.003516162,0.5355846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004344966,0.03634497,0.7497435,0.000517186,0.003084812,0.004623349,0.00928231,0.0914517,0.09446459,0.001113998,0.004146629,0.0008821599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921738,0.0001828779,0.006509673,0.0001538069,0.00004085455,0.00009677924,0.00005784637,0.000321965,0.000462499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977827,0.0001407343,0.02037136,0.0002174623,0.00005840463,0.0001261487,0.000167045,0.000215557,0.000876306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005822059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03079039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01467626947455318,"score_gpt":0.3060949598964888,"score_spread":0.2914186904219356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}