{"id":"W2115878443","doi":"10.1186/1745-6215-10-101","title":"Subgroup Analysis of Trials Is Rarely Easy (SATIRE): a study protocol for a systematic review to characterize the analysis, reporting, and claim of subgroup effects in randomized trials","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Trials","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Institute for Work & Health; McMaster University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Subgroup analysis; Medicine; Randomized controlled trial; MEDLINE; Psychological intervention; Family medicine; Clinical trial; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad"],"category_scores_codex":[0.9458144,0.002139584,0.3629063,0.008357719,0.0001672669,0.001088307,0.00433006,0.0006136589,0.001859438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9451557,0.0007451805,0.08897657,0.03035621,0.0001518566,0.0001998376,0.0003219022,0.0004422844,0.00004239989],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001311514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006433895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000131803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001456942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.0866814,0.6113517,0.2871641,0.003759992,0.01024913,0.0007936923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1171352,0.4588264,0.4087683,0.01154449,0.003335324,0.000390256],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005162424,0.0006673942,0.00009324903,0.7595509,0.1551781,0.00001138939,0.0008064507,0.000003414015,0.00000356624,0.0001568064,0.002475674,0.07589066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03051884,0.0003812825,0.0001035525,0.2393741,0.7107981,0.000004958448,0.00008941213,0.0001434915,0.000002042644,0.0003691298,0.01753257,0.0006825518],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001854964,0.4907964,0.001909018,0.00006770594,0.0000805711,0.5068446,0.0002500708,0.000006523363,0.00002659226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00004208901,0.3472169,0.0006441614,0.0002002048,0.0001356639,0.6508511,0.0000913951,0.00005205816,0.0007663782],"genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","teacher_disagreement_score":0.55562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8641606535245587,"score_gpt":0.6571716634468714,"score_spread":0.2069889900776873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}