{"id":"W2115906663","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01118.x","title":"The monarch butterfly controversy: scientific interpretations of a phenomenon","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Plant Journal","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Monarch butterfly; Phenomenon; Bacillus thuringiensis; Political science; Environmental ethics; Biology; Ecology; Epistemology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009622512,0.0000590579,0.00007505858,0.00001150436,0.0009952062,0.000286584,0.0006192042,0.00002208819,0.000257818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001077916,0.00001388029,0.00005635406,0.0002170419,0.0002700622,0.00004241247,0.00008395587,0.000231925,0.00004145165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001837153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002941517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003770736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001958377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989056,0.0001569414,0.000189201,0.00009153169,0.0003868912,0.0002698306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998954,0.0006954207,0.00007764873,0.00006520467,0.0001302007,0.00007753563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002084782,0.00007650856,0.00208331,0.000001351753,0.00004541376,0.00001799082,0.0007237244,0.00005058709,0.9146757,0.002268799,0.002655785,0.07719237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001767811,0.002712254,0.4545464,0.0001613873,0.0001365737,0.00506924,0.01312612,0.00891084,0.03988728,0.07555562,0.3973469,0.0007796335],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883892,0.0002581901,0.0000715751,0.009822692,0.0001557517,0.000110273,0.00003115709,0.000006294023,0.001154894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986819,0.0001714711,0.00002382306,0.0000543721,0.0001349371,0.000002736458,0.000004443316,5.367517e-7,0.0009257563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8747884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7654422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03559336452928517,"score_gpt":0.2320954299852122,"score_spread":0.196502065455927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}