{"id":"W2116208947","doi":"10.1287/ijoc.1030.0065","title":"The Analytic-Center Cutting-Plane Method for Variational Inequalities: A Quadratic-Cut Approach","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFORMS journal on computing","topic":"Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Quadratic equation; Cutting-plane method; Quadratic programming; Feasible region; Quadratically constrained quadratic program; Quadratic function; Active set method; Isotropic quadratic form; Plane (geometry); Variational inequality; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Binary quadratic form; Geometry; Nonlinear programming; Nonlinear system; Integer programming","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00469586,0.0002152383,0.0003000837,0.0002025254,0.001063049,0.0004843343,0.0004531607,0.00008475519,0.00004400691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003264105,0.0001365229,0.0001704332,0.0002651767,0.00004446791,0.0003859369,0.0000972674,0.0006318947,0.00001945783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002608607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001750665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001313052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002721377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997246,0.0001604141,0.001049007,0.0001832472,0.0008003998,0.0005608996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931087,0.005213362,0.0006686331,0.0002575757,0.0005916517,0.0001600853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000254857,0.0003751522,0.0001382583,0.0001335074,0.0004194367,0.000005542003,0.005175033,0.5091495,0.000009613942,0.2637456,0.007759995,0.2128335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001269568,0.000101272,0.0000121312,0.00005865442,0.00001481809,0.0002115533,0.0008889678,0.9614038,0.00004030825,0.01663681,0.01918432,0.0001777419],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006212228,0.00002149423,0.9937358,0.00113682,0.0001848225,0.0004001628,0.00001344819,0.00006028769,0.00382595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008302797,0.00001554572,0.9885465,0.0006696544,0.001200075,0.00001417366,0.00001897011,0.00004034464,0.001191949],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4522544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8176221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07408299595125604,"score_gpt":0.4087650938533386,"score_spread":0.3346820979020826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}