{"id":"W2116216435","doi":"10.1080/0003684032000125088","title":"Ricardian equivalence, expansionary fiscal contraction and the stock market: a VECM approach","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Ricardian equivalence; Private consumption; Fiscal policy; Consumption function; Government spending; Stock market; Keynesian economics; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; New Keynesian economics; Shock (circulatory); Monetary policy; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001300388,0.0004474063,0.0007742919,0.0009846448,0.0002345581,0.001646462,0.0003879707,0.0004950272,0.005622481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004858498,0.0002197792,0.0005191098,0.001410451,0.000832039,0.0009495111,0.0005986408,0.0009466711,0.0003716399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008128165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007980848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01376717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00699999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996676,0.0001591024,0.0000171051,0.00004641558,0.00004644232,0.00006326911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981443,0.001186363,0.0003818625,0.0001074174,0.0001190365,0.00006111012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001303075,0.00009280747,0.04175234,0.00009932595,0.0002503729,0.0005538145,0.000475059,0.2833703,0.001218333,0.6147108,0.003361131,0.05398532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003931462,0.0001039083,0.02502595,0.00004601515,0.00009522712,0.0001456013,0.0003121359,0.7065392,0.0004367489,0.2601778,0.007034772,0.00004336486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.841491,0.001923972,0.1312863,0.002707129,0.0001053986,0.00005470774,0.0007012902,0.0001830139,0.0215472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869072,0.00112689,0.006107965,0.0001167799,0.00009436082,0.00002250972,0.0002782387,0.00001975876,0.005326278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01376717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02737409,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02239090540857344,"score_gpt":0.193438804854188,"score_spread":0.1710478994456146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}