{"id":"W2116216435","doi":"10.1080/0003684032000125088","title":"Ricardian equivalence, expansionary fiscal contraction and the stock market: a VECM approach","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Ricardian equivalence; Private consumption; Fiscal policy; Consumption function; Government spending; Stock market; Keynesian economics; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; New Keynesian economics; Shock (circulatory); Monetary policy; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001151762,0.0002633822,0.0006213355,0.0001365303,0.0002964871,0.0001263127,0.0002493553,0.0001932886,0.0001653066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006719137,0.0002553859,0.0001676837,0.00009815933,0.000345897,0.000251264,0.0000783142,0.0002854276,0.0003031877],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001215927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002133116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004081384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004217718,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981403,0.00003401302,0.0007170145,0.0006277871,0.00001829633,0.0004626249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987631,0.0002363033,0.0003485461,0.0004936201,0.000006317267,0.000152155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001268685,0.00005164293,0.002954524,0.00001982743,0.00008968734,3.119382e-7,0.0002916415,0.000122918,0.000001805097,0.992794,0.002625044,0.0009216858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004418164,0.00003499843,0.03097228,0.00000395901,0.00002995943,0.00005637513,0.000342199,0.01129216,0.00003265451,0.8501995,0.1019465,0.000671353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2105577,0.000740159,0.001187621,0.0007230674,0.0003420935,0.0005469091,0.00007725638,0.00004195495,0.7857832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963651,0.0003093445,0.0008167012,0.001323517,0.0002153556,0.000188554,0.00001395702,0.00004318132,0.0007242564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7858074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999898,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02239090540857344,"score_gpt":0.193438804854188,"score_spread":0.1710478994456146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}