{"id":"W2116351494","doi":"10.1139/x09-017","title":"The influence of riparian vegetation on leaf litter inputs to Boreal Shield streams: implications for partial-harvest logging in riparian reserves","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Deciduous; Riparian zone; Basal area; Plant litter; Boreal; STREAMS; Taiga; Riparian forest; Litter; Environmental science; Ecology; Ecosystem; Hydrology (agriculture); Biology; Geology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004701539,0.0002206427,0.0002164107,0.0003821108,0.0002830855,0.0004993603,0.0001999412,0.0001353884,0.0004786222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001175554,0.000134725,0.0002325061,0.0002753077,0.0002635924,0.0003118894,0.0002774614,0.0001134291,0.00006192524],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005080325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004594005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02290641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07619628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998139,0.00005792628,0.00001870713,0.00003737235,0.00003991278,0.00003226661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990922,0.0002806409,0.0003308316,0.00002962603,0.00009478159,0.0001719128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001360634,0.0000361459,0.9860659,0.00002718804,0.00004461571,0.00009761386,0.000105872,0.0008424938,0.005526959,0.00003500118,0.00004675722,0.007035185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001073815,0.00003197987,0.9991804,0.000001695555,0.000006015876,0.0000249751,0.00003597354,0.0005157972,0.0001611867,0.000009476739,0.00002999496,0.000001372707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995369,0.00008787245,0.00008420371,0.000008540196,6.682044e-7,0.000002476665,0.00006171542,0.00000519073,0.0002124084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995441,0.00006588631,0.0001801832,0.000008185857,0.000002200266,0.000002487636,0.000114979,0.000002136484,0.00008000843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9770936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04554617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03991506948037447,"score_gpt":0.298664463919217,"score_spread":0.2587493944388425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}