{"id":"W2116374368","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.04.031","title":"Species abundance distribution and dynamics in two locally coupled communities","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metacommunity; Relative abundance distribution; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Metapopulation; Local extinction; Fragmentation (computing); Species diversity; Community structure; Relative species abundance; Geography; Biology; Population; Biological dispersal","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006153326,0.0001929339,0.0004610742,0.0007017436,0.0007320375,0.001009925,0.0008561617,0.0007932062,0.001662092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00372883,0.0004650242,0.0004425761,0.0003735755,0.001419171,0.0008002407,0.001073877,0.0004374637,0.0001320549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001058731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004470631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01224415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01157354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997823,0.00006950391,0.00001124406,0.00006574218,0.00002696544,0.00004437953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973704,0.001366079,0.0003780941,0.0001391533,0.0002300869,0.0005162924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004734676,0.001236283,0.4133587,0.0002239997,0.0009234315,0.002569099,0.00784386,0.3926894,0.1153747,0.03880955,0.0008433702,0.02139302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025758,0.0003310638,0.1576184,0.00001099872,0.0001674098,0.0003780294,0.002189019,0.8266062,0.001679778,0.01044528,0.0002222296,0.00009404338],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992095,0.000007071444,0.0006228933,0.00001606553,5.741813e-7,0.000002587906,0.000007565844,0.000003849542,0.0001298306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994041,0.0000049965,0.0004080384,0.000004631745,9.655777e-7,0.00000435206,0.00001577566,0.000001735888,0.000155504],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01224415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02434576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008445849776094602,"score_gpt":0.2474191465309465,"score_spread":0.2389732967548519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}