{"id":"W2116566096","doi":"10.1007/3-540-35828-5_1","title":"Taming Agents and Objects in Software Engineering","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Software engineering; Software development; Social software engineering; Software system; Component-based software engineering; Software construction; Software framework; Context (archaeology); Resource-oriented architecture; Software; Systems engineering; Programming language; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001933936,0.0007711308,0.0006829206,0.0009320986,0.001299226,0.003731715,0.001140873,0.001971633,0.003051179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005852241,0.0005419865,0.0003871152,0.0009844871,0.008279534,0.01028939,0.003110352,0.003245425,0.0006862829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009511599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000772239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000468088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003887484,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985259,0.0008281192,0.00005544006,0.0001217934,0.0003770759,0.00009164245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961146,0.002728555,0.0001755888,0.0006749963,0.0001833715,0.0001228942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001394747,0.00001515286,0.0001088867,0.00006905047,0.000005465998,0.00009680021,0.002492403,0.001053125,0.0003370804,0.9713796,0.001168509,0.02325987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001078642,0.00003369113,0.00005603769,0.00007823432,0.00001230836,0.0001989513,0.0007727318,0.002834955,0.0007696616,0.9565053,0.03871658,0.00001077944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06954577,0.01979615,0.6721177,0.01160799,0.001293837,0.0001210101,0.0000367303,0.0006304402,0.2248504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8424097,0.007645906,0.09223867,0.0009779395,0.0003874304,0.0001888844,0.00003585561,0.0002495653,0.05586605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003731715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01022774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01586337200261088,"score_gpt":0.2233467149213834,"score_spread":0.2074833429187725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}