{"id":"W2116600694","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01071.x","title":"Predicting the impacts of an introduced species from its invasion history: an empirical approach applied to zebra mussel invasions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Freshwater Biology","topic":"Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":262,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Australian National University","keywords":"Dreissena; Zebra mussel; Invasive species; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Introduced species; Range (aeronautics); Biology; Benthic zone; Propagule pressure; Empirical modelling; Fishery; Mussel; Bivalvia; Population; Mollusca; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004811492,0.0008723738,0.0004514632,0.001444633,0.0008007284,0.001298761,0.001290353,0.0009978256,0.001726655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01970012,0.0004717503,0.0005307857,0.0009201234,0.0009283305,0.00113944,0.001286658,0.001203186,0.0002898263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001310349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001032691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02571968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03226181,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999014,0.0005940337,0.00008224084,0.000152325,0.0001138402,0.00004342389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767379,0.01925509,0.001443815,0.0008080203,0.001392812,0.0003623425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002382153,0.002074685,0.4473532,0.0001491434,0.0003132016,0.0004019004,0.000729306,0.4897186,0.001684987,0.001448785,0.0008506041,0.05503731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002580278,0.0004611384,0.0539367,0.00002999181,0.00004906646,0.0000742289,0.000424393,0.9427652,0.0004793229,0.001240828,0.0004814243,0.00003196474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897025,0.00008932708,0.008614145,0.0001541724,0.000006066542,0.0001160225,0.0001396231,0.00004061939,0.001137613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823121,0.000158262,0.01623436,0.00004493407,0.00001211335,0.0001592085,0.0003092021,0.00001399795,0.0007558321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02571968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05113995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0559203437543109,"score_gpt":0.2564782304080452,"score_spread":0.2005578866537343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}