{"id":"W2116664388","doi":"10.2166/wst.2001.0280","title":"Water quality response to riparian restoration in an agricultural watershed in Vermont, USA","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Science & Technology","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Riparian zone; Environmental science; Watershed; Hydrology (agriculture); Nonpoint source pollution; Water quality; Surface runoff; Watershed management; Stream restoration; Total suspended solids; Detention basin; Environmental engineering; Water resource management; STREAMS; Stormwater; Sewage treatment; Ecology; Engineering; Chemical oxygen demand","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002821164,0.0001447133,0.0002116483,0.0003711593,0.0009611973,0.0006969855,0.000436387,0.0004143183,0.0006919341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008825357,0.0001143974,0.0001272615,0.0009554369,0.0004779345,0.000236886,0.0005584328,0.000268412,0.00009625089],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004849622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002343432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3456393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995395,0.0001184205,0.00002287496,0.00008735315,0.0001111866,0.0001206722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993134,0.00006377308,0.0001490328,0.00002370202,0.0002480552,0.0002021325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007334182,0.0006975667,0.9609714,0.00004917217,0.0001388292,0.001398108,0.001275467,0.001366164,0.009805492,0.0001019606,0.001610851,0.02185149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002060221,0.00018955,0.9962794,0.000008048361,0.00001619315,0.00006642096,0.0009330659,0.001061261,0.0005662789,0.00003472195,0.000819934,0.000004527881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992486,0.00004996668,0.00004226498,0.00008078496,0.000004134055,0.00001928869,0.0001323194,0.00000727057,0.0004152868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998489,0.00005578157,0.0001642413,0.0001147415,0.000004807661,0.00002299415,0.0004642039,0.00000187968,0.0006822489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3456393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6872548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01578096747701449,"score_gpt":0.2632021512729563,"score_spread":0.2474211837959418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}