{"id":"W2116795926","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2004.2957","title":"The consequences of Zipf's law for syntax and symbolic reference","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences","topic":"Language and cultural evolution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; Generalitat de Catalunya; Royal Society; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Zipf's law; Syntax; Ambiguity; Computer science; sort; Communications system; Entropy (arrow of time); Theoretical computer science; Natural language processing; Programming language; Mathematics; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002108401,0.0002775794,0.0007381577,0.00144182,0.001530235,0.002434015,0.000782537,0.001784865,0.006033093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02177917,0.0002583481,0.0006907965,0.001112829,0.007068141,0.005430723,0.001152704,0.001862449,0.001091624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001413426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007866069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002118941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001052464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99876,0.0003084943,0.00006142381,0.0003138033,0.0003966835,0.0001596178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885872,0.007822299,0.0008937905,0.001366692,0.0009424158,0.0003876793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003058329,0.000007222969,0.0008965501,0.00004067974,0.00001121513,0.0001655992,0.0003262,0.003770481,0.001117525,0.9808556,0.002099233,0.01067908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001842011,0.00001592314,0.001221093,0.00001065085,0.000006516956,0.0002768893,0.00004480113,0.009379759,0.0005024918,0.9853736,0.003124133,0.00002566882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2906374,0.003053134,0.5336941,0.01917853,0.0004118351,0.0001391306,0.001103294,0.0009836156,0.1507989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612879,0.0009587429,0.03082721,0.001113276,0.0003998755,0.000135224,0.0001909271,0.0001068326,0.004979905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006033093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02018273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04295064284193948,"score_gpt":0.3025182159496375,"score_spread":0.259567573107698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}