{"id":"W2116981252","doi":"10.1007/s11160-004-5422-y","title":"Retrospective evaluation of data-limited fisheries: a case from Hong Kong","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Eye Institute; University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Fishery; Fishing; Ecosystem; Dominance (genetics); Fisheries management; Resource (disambiguation); Fisheries science; Marine ecosystem; Benthic zone; Stock assessment; Environmental resource management; Biology; Ecology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008985092,0.000138875,0.00042826,0.00002069029,0.00009185635,0.00001025372,0.0001541787,0.00008799125,0.000542229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004357064,0.0001076591,0.00003131869,0.0001930492,0.0003193244,0.0003353337,0.0004877266,0.0001080787,0.000009812854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000972486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001035132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004726124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04174526,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987826,0.00019848,0.0003835427,0.0003951219,0.00008799048,0.000152277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993985,0.00004952815,0.0001634292,0.0003411776,0.00001840785,0.00002895611],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147458,0.00003629818,0.9362069,0.00002892797,0.00001893918,0.00001644905,0.0006478129,0.000001064864,0.0001155749,0.00003925763,0.001343741,0.06153033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007220928,0.0001279855,0.9291357,0.0001299411,0.00008417677,0.00006128169,0.000399363,0.0001166194,0.00003239925,0.006764679,0.06220461,0.0002211537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922494,0.002803418,0.00003069246,0.0006469276,0.0001430461,0.0004877884,0.0001315675,0.0000137154,0.003493458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992939,0.006037697,0.000644212,0.0001366387,0.00004006354,0.00005973237,0.0001016003,0.000005349758,0.00003569614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06130918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9757404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08901581023292754,"score_gpt":0.3132840591237074,"score_spread":0.2242682488907798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}