{"id":"W2116988904","doi":"10.1109/secon.2008.4494277","title":"Probabilistic analysis of the ASW protocol using PRISM","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Authentication Protocols Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Concordia University","keywords":"Protocol (science); Computer science; Probabilistic logic; Computer security; Cryptographic protocol; Key exchange; Key (lock); Model checking; Trusted third party; Prism; Protocol analysis; Security analysis; Computer network; Cryptography; Theoretical computer science; Public-key cryptography; Encryption","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006669112,0.0006717918,0.0007630563,0.00145687,0.001253008,0.002527835,0.002274302,0.001070765,0.004211228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01783555,0.0006581534,0.002227589,0.001169755,0.002630589,0.003683727,0.002829995,0.002663832,0.0005309314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002243572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005552889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007428373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003415709,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929397,0.002273463,0.000345883,0.0005936323,0.00318138,0.0006659027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879879,0.006979261,0.001310294,0.00151995,0.002001282,0.000201375],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001063385,0.00004344686,0.0007302929,0.0001341937,0.00005958268,0.0003234568,0.0002858049,0.3047235,0.004260752,0.6797442,0.0009790477,0.0086093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002549162,0.0000318881,0.0001006596,0.00001524231,0.0000246468,0.00007555758,0.0000422615,0.8718141,0.003224686,0.1221985,0.002426499,0.00002041141],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01675995,0.00005688253,0.9762423,0.0003588036,0.00002850449,0.0001254565,0.0001923124,0.000787335,0.005448553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6385815,0.0003940438,0.3521458,0.0002968293,0.00005921387,0.0007243362,0.0004547932,0.0003335964,0.007009917],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007428373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03527009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04863909097880728,"score_gpt":0.3267161800630487,"score_spread":0.2780770890842414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}