{"id":"W2116998814","doi":"10.1109/twc.2010.03.091085","title":"Analysis of area under the ROC curve of energy detection","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications","topic":"Cognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fading; Maximal-ratio combining; Detector; Rayleigh fading; Diversity combining; Figure of merit; Nakagami distribution; Receiver operating characteristic; Statistics; Channel (broadcasting); Energy (signal processing); Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging); Diversity gain; Algorithm; Computer science; Mathematics; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01893888,0.001526882,0.00191257,0.005179496,0.0004237797,0.002795994,0.001321268,0.002235149,0.001435472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1044297,0.0003314957,0.001346542,0.003198318,0.001365529,0.002980088,0.001169462,0.001130975,0.0005893048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001209973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007645466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001143484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004175679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9857551,0.007642672,0.0008952169,0.002035638,0.002981459,0.0006898891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8981916,0.08088312,0.008084976,0.004396874,0.007685255,0.0007581151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00290212,0.0003566036,0.139166,0.001564927,0.002845896,0.001558303,0.0008248285,0.4257919,0.0104249,0.04173846,0.008973793,0.3638523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007350519,0.001846877,0.06505218,0.0002197905,0.0005713894,0.00460415,0.000500451,0.8787208,0.009514402,0.02911235,0.009453577,0.0003304574],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2881961,0.01403679,0.6781264,0.00126705,0.0002857383,0.0003975604,0.002195365,0.002406482,0.01308862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471207,0.001484135,0.04845948,0.000275497,0.0001822557,0.0002872513,0.001225787,0.0001519208,0.0008130702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01893888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1001596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02192369086704642,"score_gpt":0.253472610909532,"score_spread":0.2315489200424856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}