{"id":"W2117162071","doi":"10.3763/ehaz.2009.0006","title":"Comparison of homeowner response to wildfire risk among towns with and without wildfire management","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Hazards","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Risk management; Business; Wildland–urban interface; Attribution; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Risk perception; Perception; Geography; Environmental science; Finance; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004113265,0.0001184509,0.0001319097,0.0006205154,0.0004497262,0.0006061083,0.0002263934,0.0001631677,0.001994917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001600516,0.00009388036,0.000114917,0.0003747558,0.0003956645,0.0002126993,0.0003554474,0.0002106196,0.0000979125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005710685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003320882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0678748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1854766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997069,0.00006833525,0.00001523138,0.00003221381,0.0001154102,0.00006185863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985464,0.0002934863,0.000524873,0.00006626691,0.0002769481,0.0002920277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005870244,0.00009087747,0.9936359,0.000006900593,0.0000260663,0.00005956918,0.002474895,0.00004259991,0.0005875654,0.00002542125,0.00007378012,0.002917738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001065717,0.0000356556,0.9954838,0.000001549351,0.000003066817,0.00002653624,0.004220621,0.00005853508,0.00007830051,0.00001026006,0.00007880482,0.000001844274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997488,0.000005954501,0.00001405044,0.00000539551,5.164096e-7,0.000001335243,0.00001437009,6.036288e-7,0.0002090089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997062,0.00001116695,0.00002368534,0.000004809616,0.000001000178,0.000001900188,0.000039789,3.076859e-7,0.000211074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0678748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1349594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.003700590182435323,"score_gpt":0.2236986364362605,"score_spread":0.2199980462538252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}