{"id":"W2117184085","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2012-0042","title":"Modeling co-occurring species: a simulation study on the effects of spatial scale for setting management targets","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Marine Fisheries Service","keywords":"Fishing; Habitat; Marine protected area; Fisheries management; Abundance (ecology); Fishery; Maximum sustainable yield; Ecology; Sustainable yield; Environmental science; Vulnerable species; Geography; Biology; Endangered species","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004347636,0.000979465,0.001084236,0.001283792,0.00116052,0.001423591,0.002231787,0.00201087,0.002319674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0125804,0.0005514112,0.001656278,0.001722645,0.001008427,0.001795651,0.001396694,0.001826894,0.0001523304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002734117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002002222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09634354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06851923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987838,0.00070767,0.00005764551,0.0001680697,0.00007702222,0.0002058243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816601,0.01439891,0.001539956,0.0007417838,0.0008445125,0.00081464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116998,0.0001822781,0.01674273,0.00002179447,0.00008042124,0.00007813233,0.0000647473,0.9794385,0.0002702431,0.001592,0.0002346212,0.001177583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003721015,0.0000613188,0.001725411,0.000005950132,0.00003788515,0.00001331446,0.00009730226,0.9971601,0.0001006356,0.0006265389,0.0001222182,0.00001213774],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893985,0.0001546261,0.006870599,0.0004110768,0.00002311873,0.00005754006,0.0003628458,0.00006287835,0.002658899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946714,0.00009491971,0.004369026,0.00006496133,0.000007396666,0.00005943828,0.0001896083,0.00002350357,0.0005198446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09634354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1915655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02340159745645425,"score_gpt":0.2541811783912838,"score_spread":0.2307795809348296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}