{"id":"W2117305208","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00851.x","title":"No exit? Intellectual integrity under the regime of ‘evidence’ and ‘best‐practices’","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Power (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Accountability; Law and economics; Political science; Health care; Faith; Fundamentalism; Politics; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Medicine; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2398638,0.0008953004,0.003548983,0.002865297,0.01263381,0.04347623,0.005105827,0.02487549,0.00366288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3020453,0.001332504,0.001602799,0.002428254,0.2182593,0.05495465,0.01968829,0.04370805,0.001736667],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01283334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02683589,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003367523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001771941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6825181,0.2194819,0.01406874,0.01347021,0.0620494,0.008411612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6355526,0.2448852,0.02374062,0.05399269,0.03335861,0.008470187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002817316,0.00002305555,0.0001298021,0.00008618824,0.00001874442,0.00003541678,0.008119206,0.0001069282,0.00007433123,0.9786725,0.006580456,0.006125143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000380579,0.00003613452,0.0001355522,0.0003774002,0.0000118677,0.00005256394,0.003090472,0.0002565002,0.0001911208,0.9550043,0.04076199,0.00004401643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007359755,0.005541787,0.0374628,0.890241,0.002929187,0.00008939177,0.00004159166,0.000106701,0.0562278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7636703,0.003726331,0.0299496,0.179053,0.007975674,0.0008018937,0.00007431239,0.0004309074,0.01431784],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9373832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9445840990574581,"score_gpt":0.7518854572933156,"score_spread":0.1926986417641425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}