{"id":"W2117305208","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00851.x","title":"No exit? Intellectual integrity under the regime of ‘evidence’ and ‘best‐practices’","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Power (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Accountability; Law and economics; Political science; Health care; Faith; Fundamentalism; Politics; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Medicine; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3180359,0.0002017456,0.0007111058,0.0004254717,0.0003735638,0.00004124195,0.0004528725,0.0006085325,0.0009471832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7908604,0.0001255434,0.0001670598,0.0009826019,0.0004381812,0.003307528,0.0002247227,0.008019638,0.0002651752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003023047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003270376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001638367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001054941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9451996,0.04324455,0.007612868,0.0004545012,0.0029005,0.0005879845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3502993,0.6120134,0.02260515,0.0009349633,0.01364237,0.0005048137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.05073428,0.01233318,0.3917466,0.002398945,0.001644534,0.0002983432,0.04574799,0.000192745,0.0006983054,0.02260331,0.1215732,0.3500285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006463605,0.00526118,0.3270962,0.004707977,0.001805534,0.0004628474,0.1508405,0.002249149,0.0000405399,0.01199076,0.4885457,0.0005360589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7995592,0.004702144,0.003633133,0.1575726,0.005682822,0.001711339,0.00000271644,0.0000164072,0.02711964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562474,0.01447303,0.009772912,0.01650181,0.002317494,0.00001696372,0.000001255211,0.00003342293,0.0006357285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5949003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9445840990574581,"score_gpt":0.7518854572933156,"score_spread":0.1926986417641425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}