{"id":"W2117390786","doi":"10.1108/eb043499","title":"Dimension Reduction in the Computation of Value‐at‐Risk","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Risk Finance","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Value at risk; Portfolio; Dimensionality reduction; Computation; Dimension (graph theory); Econometrics; Order (exchange); Economics; Reduction (mathematics); Curse of dimensionality; Value (mathematics); Financial economics; Risk management; Computer science; Mathematics; Finance; Statistics; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002786115,0.0008081059,0.001358985,0.001133169,0.0005449901,0.002135707,0.0007682018,0.0009855697,0.00117552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01618172,0.0006154936,0.0009364157,0.0009054534,0.001058547,0.001794698,0.002191673,0.002223501,0.0003449086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006734845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009485382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001948227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001849258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983392,0.0009035594,0.0001065815,0.0001529856,0.0003985306,0.0000991063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992394,0.00569413,0.0004111906,0.0007216772,0.0006102828,0.0001686773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003822882,0.0001682557,0.004380914,0.0002101909,0.0002590351,0.0002162256,0.0003132269,0.6539342,0.003553466,0.1226117,0.007271303,0.2066992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001993076,0.00003204755,0.0006206415,0.00001716441,0.00001606195,0.0000412223,0.00001610945,0.9448973,0.000672379,0.05265165,0.0009946898,0.00002094882],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03789733,0.001010781,0.957807,0.0008065231,0.000120302,0.0000407189,0.0001020314,0.000350283,0.001864914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4528384,0.001507625,0.5422576,0.0003058267,0.0004155167,0.0002292253,0.000424236,0.0001484918,0.001873102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002786115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01473457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04901928401463922,"score_gpt":0.3207650749558758,"score_spread":0.2717457909412365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}