{"id":"W2117607513","doi":"10.1093/icesjms/fst049","title":"The paradox of the “paradox of the plankton”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICES Journal of Marine Science","topic":"Marine and coastal ecosystems","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Zooplankton; Plankton; Biodiversity; Diversity (politics); Ecosystem; Competitive exclusion; Ecology; Phytoplankton; Trait; Competition (biology); Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Biology; Sociology; Nutrient; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001622226,0.0000988501,0.0001891571,0.00005743223,0.0003842669,0.0001193795,0.002277839,0.00002436769,0.0005848014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002297347,0.00003712201,0.0001363052,0.0006801476,0.0007939935,0.0004681197,0.0002662587,0.0002211243,0.00001857932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004528467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002599099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004380221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003067914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979873,0.000112704,0.0005397405,0.0001159606,0.0009812156,0.0002631161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980718,0.0003060465,0.0008756973,0.000396553,0.0002578089,0.00009211926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003412147,0.00002219944,0.8736182,0.0000264705,0.00001862172,0.000001738925,0.0002117481,0.001020926,0.0005112877,0.0003477809,0.001074765,0.1231121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001576513,0.000149282,0.9829925,0.00004919685,0.00001423356,0.0001235874,0.0003392948,0.002854009,0.001485124,0.002692173,0.009073528,0.00006943502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9624659,0.0002282919,0.000005364737,0.001465716,0.001056712,0.0001538569,0.000007207041,0.000002271146,0.03461464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988071,0.00008237937,0.00007984784,0.0000959723,0.00009506698,3.799822e-7,1.947743e-7,0.000001476628,0.0008375306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1230427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6621614,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006927497352378151,"score_gpt":0.1911823687042085,"score_spread":0.1842548713518304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}