{"id":"W2117662116","doi":"10.1093/ije/dyr106","title":"Is rigorous retrospective harmonization possible? Application of the DataSHaPER approach across 53 large studies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Epidemiology","topic":"Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa; McGill University; Ontario Genomics; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"University of Western Sydney; National Institutes of Health; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Harmonization; Retrospective cohort study; Medicine; Medical physics; Intensive care medicine; Computer science; Internal medicine; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7444032,0.002744053,0.005719995,0.02318103,0.003561138,0.01264128,0.007240373,0.003213837,0.002759259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8494858,0.003707187,0.009551123,0.02798685,0.007213919,0.007267179,0.01720662,0.003581815,0.0005561273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008282146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0251415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003257135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004034486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1256072,0.6318179,0.1868836,0.01497282,0.03925464,0.001463856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09459052,0.5347011,0.08434876,0.2059806,0.07909443,0.001284556],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006178492,0.0004651597,0.1692331,0.08787832,0.04475355,0.002088116,0.09725024,0.01389555,0.006445167,0.07621083,0.02048147,0.47512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005741893,0.005479898,0.1986102,0.1108436,0.05220582,0.003358461,0.03806565,0.0280688,0.02942843,0.1212097,0.4051227,0.0018648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1135597,0.03020434,0.6971648,0.008520122,0.002817867,0.1210502,0.0118182,0.001139026,0.01372571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3169556,0.003710416,0.5301843,0.002447138,0.0003747564,0.1417082,0.003623975,0.000405419,0.0005903034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2555968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3151965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.101137615390685,"score_gpt":0.3855859492311527,"score_spread":0.2844483338404677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}