{"id":"W2117916066","doi":"10.1139/f08-209","title":"Effects of sampling effort, assemblage similarity, and habitat heterogeneity on estimates of species richness and relative abundance of stream fishes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks","keywords":"Species richness; Abundance (ecology); Catch per unit effort; Sampling (signal processing); STREAMS; Relative species abundance; Jaccard index; Ecology; Habitat; Environmental science; Electrofishing; Species diversity; Biology; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01361539,0.0004210086,0.0003238074,0.0006871023,0.0003565175,0.0006459967,0.0003862055,0.0003845237,0.0004973941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04338695,0.0003201746,0.0005978348,0.0005968636,0.0007050067,0.001102905,0.0007326978,0.0003668581,0.00007542717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005155322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003778137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006095355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0157596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.988437,0.007946464,0.0008527528,0.001182298,0.001241844,0.0003396914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9243128,0.06100557,0.009112478,0.002275949,0.002134008,0.001159292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003090779,0.00009320994,0.9907578,0.00001704466,0.0002283717,0.0000505283,0.0001436329,0.001348444,0.0007296824,0.00003734303,0.00002917214,0.006255645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009642802,0.00049953,0.9934408,0.00000595139,0.00007250679,0.00006785487,0.00007912887,0.005208586,0.000460968,0.00006027735,0.00008706367,0.000007699901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986557,0.0001047797,0.000951704,0.00002056432,0.000001882723,0.00001486437,0.00003329596,0.000006244431,0.0002109783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986073,0.00003057727,0.001128975,0.00001938696,0.000005118075,0.00002313303,0.0000838813,0.000003841301,0.00009783533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01361539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07200587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01736445710818849,"score_gpt":0.2337574139842073,"score_spread":0.2163929568760188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}