{"id":"W2117956010","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00816.x","title":"Clarity in Defining Product Design: Inspiring Research Opportunities for the Design Process<sup>*</sup>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Product (mathematics); Product design; Macro; Process (computing); Process management; Design review (U.S. government); New product development; Research design; Business; Computer science; Design process; Knowledge management; Marketing; Sociology; Product testing; Work in process","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08067551,0.0008878959,0.0008747039,0.002572722,0.005085892,0.01607363,0.002252321,0.006000753,0.002538557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07376708,0.001161435,0.001202539,0.002233361,0.03496771,0.02580495,0.009470627,0.01023157,0.000732938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01105565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001683814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002120104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9274704,0.0603459,0.002887092,0.001774882,0.006229978,0.001291628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7926023,0.1822891,0.005514356,0.007421959,0.01000474,0.002167595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004232222,0.00005174212,0.001030905,0.0004392255,0.00001335706,0.000172601,0.06518795,0.0006753136,0.0006440235,0.8877047,0.003194219,0.04084359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005343556,0.0002377514,0.001792026,0.002201449,0.00004559093,0.0008195923,0.07183293,0.005238506,0.00339893,0.7030662,0.2112211,0.00009259042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03732802,0.01764893,0.67935,0.1683259,0.002556567,0.0005725969,0.00004545524,0.0001921293,0.09398044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.562036,0.009658667,0.3976019,0.01759469,0.001056819,0.001234862,0.00006425076,0.0002677358,0.01048494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08067551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.426658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5044861945715764,"score_gpt":0.3968780067120216,"score_spread":0.1076081878595548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}